<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>acroyear2 &#187; aphex twin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acroyear2.org/tags/aphex-twin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acroyear2.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Great albums 3: Aphex Twin</title>
		<link>http://www.acroyear2.org/2008/07/13/great-albums-3-aphex-twin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acroyear2.org/2008/07/13/great-albums-3-aphex-twin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aphex twin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great albums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acroyear2.org/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some of these great albums, I&#8217;m going to have to listen to them a bunch of times before writing to get my thoughts together. Aphex Twin&#8217;s Come To Daddy EP is absolutely not one of those. Released at around the height of his popularity (I think &#8220;Windowlicker&#8221; takes that crown, though), this is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some of these great albums, I&#8217;m going to have to listen to them a bunch of times before writing to get my thoughts together. Aphex Twin&#8217;s <cite>Come To Daddy</cite> EP is absolutely not one of those. Released at around the height of his popularity (I think &#8220;Windowlicker&#8221; takes that crown, though), this is not only an amazing sampler of most of Aphex Twin&#8217;s styles (only really missing the ambient work of his early career), but also possibly his best release, or, at least, the most consistent.<span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>Usually, for Richard D. James, there are a couple of terrible tracks marring an otherwise great album (&#8220;INKEY$&#8221;, I&#8217;m looking at you). Here, there are no missteps. But before I go into a track-by-track review, let me say that if you&#8217;ve been meaning to get into Aphex Twin but haven&#8217;t yet, or you&#8217;ve heard a little but haven&#8217;t liked it, listen to this record. If you&#8217;re totally unfamiliar with Aphex Twin, also listen to this record: he is unquestionably one of the most influential and enigmatic artists in recent years. For a few years in the late 90s, it seemed like everyone was talking about him, and with good reason. While he&#8217;s not all he&#8217;s said to be&#8212;no one can be <em>that</em> much of a genius&#8212;his work is, in general, highly enjoyable and definitely worth listening to.</p>
<p>Here we have, as I said, all facets of RDJ on display. &#8220;Flim&#8221; and &#8220;Iz-Us&#8221; are both incredibly beautiful and delicate, displaying that almost effortless sense of melody that is in the best Aphex songs. An old housemate of mine and I have a long-running argument about which is better, but on some level it doesn&#8217;t even matter. Both of them are what a million artists have been trying their whole careers to make. I should write about them more, but can&#8217;t&#8212;they&#8217;re too effortless and perfect to waste words on.</p>
<p>This mix of &#8220;To Cure A Weakling Child&#8221; and &#8220;Funny Little Man&#8221; are both slightly off-kilter, featuring bouncy carnival atmosphere and nonsense lyrics. They&#8217;re not as stellar as the highlights on the record, but particularly &#8220;To Cure A Weakling Child&#8221; is much more well-developed than the average &#8220;throwaway&#8221; Aphex song. Even on &#8220;Funny Little Man&#8221; he&#8217;s more restrained than he is on tracks like &#8220;Milkman&#8221; and &#8220;Beetles&#8221; (from other records). &#8220;Bucephalus Bouncing Ball&#8221; rounds out the middle section with essentially a study in panning effects.</p>
<p>That leaves us with the three mixes of the title track. The &#8220;Mummy mix&#8221; is not really worth mentioning, being much lighter in tone than the track really should be. I remember it primarily for the &#8220;Go on, give us a snare rush&#8221; sample (followed by a brief shock of noise). I find it difficult to even hear the same song in the &#8220;Little Lord Fauntleroy mix&#8221;. It&#8217;s fun and typically Aphex, and keeps attention better than the other, but I never press &#8220;repeat&#8221; when I hear it.</p>
<p>This is probably because &#8220;Pappy mix&#8221; is perhaps the best Aphex Twin song ever recorded. The lyrics are somehow delivered in a manner which masks their inane quality and makes them menacing. The standout part of this track, though, is the amazing drum programming. I believe &#8220;Come To Daddy (Pappy mix)&#8221; contains the best sequenced drum track of all time. Their complexity and fluidity is astounding. Everything drops out at 2:20 to be replaced by a chilling distorted scream that rises in intensity, before finally more bass drums that sound like a horse stampeding towards the listener brings everything back in for an extended coda that sounds like <cite>Anvil Vapre</cite>-era Autechre. One of the best pieces of music ever made.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like &#8220;Come To Daddy (Pappy mix)&#8221;, &#8220;Flim&#8221;, or at least the fact that <em>the same man</em> made both of them and then put them <em>right next to each other</em> on his record, then I don&#8217;t know what to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acroyear2.org/2008/07/13/great-albums-3-aphex-twin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
